RSS

Monthly Archives: March 2013

One Elderly Couple’s Losses and Hard Lessons Learned

Miriam Parker

In this Thursday, April 19, 2012 photo, Miriam Parker and her daughter Donna stand in the dining room of her Raleigh, N.C., home. Donna Parker and her siblings struggled for nearly seven years to extricate her parents from the clutches of an international sweepstakes scam. (AP Photo/Allen Breed)

RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — With their elderly parents seated across the octagonal oak table, Donna and Jim Parker were back in the kitchen they knew so well — the hutch along one wall crammed with plates, bells and salt-and-pepper shakers picked up during family trips; at the table’s corner, the spindly wooden high chair where a 7-year-old Jim had tearfully confessed to setting a neighbor’s woods ablaze.

It was Christmastime, but this was no holiday gathering. Now, it was the parents who were in deep trouble, and this was an intervention.

For the past year, Charles and Miriam Parker, both 81, had been in the thrall of an international sweepstakes scam. The retired educators, with a half-dozen college degrees between them, had lost tens of thousands of dollars.

But money wasn’t just leaving the Parker house. Strangely, large sums were now coming in, too.

Their four children were worried, but had so far been powerless to open their parents’ eyes. If they wouldn’t listen to their kids, Donna thought, maybe they’d listen to people with badges.

And so, joining them at the family table that late-December day in 2005 were Special Agent Joan Fleming of the FBI and David Evers, an investigator from the North Carolina attorney general’s telemarketing fraud unit.

At first, the Parkers were angry at what they considered their children’s betrayal. They had always been wary of the government, particularly the Internal Revenue Service. “Well, they’re just after your money,” Charles Parker would say.

But they’d politely invited the two officers in.

The home was littered with sweepstakes mailers and “claim” forms, the cupboards bare of just about everything but canned soup, bread and crackers. Charles Parker acknowledged to their guests that he’d lost a lot of money, but expressed confidence that he and his wife would eventually succeed if they just kept “investing.”

Evers and Fleming showed the couple a video of other elderly scam victims, then played a taped interview of a former con man describing how he operated. Charles was alarmed by what he was seeing and hearing, but his wife seemed to be barely paying attention.

The officers explained they were there to ask for the Parkers’ help in catching these predators. With their permission, Evers installed a “mooch line” on the kitchen phone so they could capture incoming calls.

Charles, a war veteran, was tickled at the notion of being part of an undercover operation. He and his wife pledged their cooperation.

After gathering up some of the mailings for evidence, the officers left, encouraged by what seemed a few hours well spent.

But in the coming months and years, things would only get worse for the Parker family — much worse.

freemoneyIt’s important to note at the outset that the Parkers were hardly unsophisticated people, the type to be easily fooled. Born in 1924, Charles Alexander Parker and Miriam Wilkinson were high school sweethearts back in Pitman, N.J. Charles served on a Navy destroyer escort off north Africa in World War II, after which they married and embarked on a life of learning and teaching.

Charles earned a doctorate in speech communications, and Miriam received a pair of master’s degrees, one in special education. Along the way, Miriam gave birth to four children: Donna, Jim, Linda and Carole.

After teaching stints around the South, Charles Parker took a position in the English department at North Carolina State in Raleigh, from which he would eventually retire. In 1966, the couple built a split-level home in a neighborhood with streets named for flowering trees, and later converted the garage into a classroom for Miriam’s special-needs pupils.

Through their hard work and thrift, the Parkers were able to send all four children to college and pay off their home. They bought a piece of land in the North Carolina mountains and put a camping trailer on it, eventually replacing it with a house.

Between their savings and Charles’ pension, they were looking at a comfortable retirement.

Then the conman entered their lives.

___

Older Americans lose $2.9 billion a year to fraud, according to a study conducted last year by the National Committee for the Prevention of Elder Abuse and the Center for Gerontology at Virginia Tech. Most victims are between 80 and 89, and most are women.

“Elder financial abuse is becoming the crime of the 21st century,” Denise Voigt Crawford, past president of the North American Securities Administrators Association, said when the report was released.

Using the latest technologies, “these criminals need not defraud their victims face-to-face,” David Kirkman and Virginia H. Templeton wrote in a 2007 article for the journal Alzheimer’s Care Today. From far away, “they can identify vulnerable seniors, contact them, and induce them to part with their savings.”

A slowing down of brain function comes with normal aging, they noted. The elderly are susceptible to errors in judgment, particularly in situations where a snap decision is required — such as during a telemarketing call.

“Experience teaches us that those with mild dementia tend to be the most vulnerable,” wrote Kirkman and Templeton, respectively an assistant attorney general in North Carolina and a gerontologist.

The Mayo Clinic defines “mild cognitive impairment” as an “intermediate stage between the expected cognitive decline of normal aging and the more pronounced decline of dementia.”

The basis for a diagnosis in many cases: falling victim to repeated scams.

___

No one can say exactly how the trouble began in the Parkers’ case.

They might have made a small donation to some charity or responded to a sweepstakes letter they got in the mail. Somehow, the couple ended up on what people in the industry call the “sucker list.”

And once they were marked, the scammers proceeded to “reload” them.

You’ve won this multimillion-dollar lottery, they’d say. All you need to do is send us the money to cover the taxes, and we’ll send you your prize.

So on Dec. 8, 2004, Miriam Parker — then 80 — drove herself to the Wal-Mart down the road to send a MoneyGram to Montreal, Quebec.

Isolation from absent children is often one of the hallmarks in cases like these. But that wasn’t so with the Parkers. Sure, Jim had settled in Ohio, and Carole was living in Florida. But Linda and Donna were both just down the road in Cary.

With three kids to raise, Linda wasn’t able to look in on their parents all that often. So she and the others counted on Donna, the eldest, to keep an eye on things.

A busy real estate agent and teacher, Donna popped in as often as she could. But she’d always appreciated her parents for not trying to tell her and her siblings how to live their lives, and she did her best to return the courtesy.

In her parents’ living room is a plaque that reads, “Mom’s 10 Commandments for a Happy Household.” No 10 on the list: “If I say do it, don’t ask why.”

No. 6: “If it rings, answer it.”

And so, over a series of calls, Howard Clark — a man with a warm voice who called her “dear” and “sweetheart” — had learned enough personal information about Miriam to convince her that he was the family’s ticket to riches.

After her Dec. 8 MoneyGram, other wires followed on Dec. 13 and 16.

On Jan. 12, 2005, she sent a Federal Express package to a “Mr. Stewart” on Papineau Street in Montreal. Inside, as instructed, was a magazine with $12,550 in cash sandwiched between its pages.

The Parkers had quickly become what authorities refer to as “super victims.”

Though trusting, Miriam asked Howard repeatedly when they would receive their winnings. One day, he called to say he was on his way to deliver the prize in person — only to call back to say he’d been detained at the border, and that he needed her to send $200 so he could defray things. She sent him the money.

By May 2005, the Parkers had blown through their savings. They had tapped into their home equity line and had maxed out several credit cards. Willing as they still were, the Parkers were running out of things to give.

Unwittingly, their children had contributed to the problem. When Miriam asked Donna for a $7,000 loan, the daughter thought little of it.

Through most of their marriage, Charles Parker had taken care of the couple’s finances. But in 1989, shortly after his retirement, he suffered a heart attack. That was followed by colon cancer. As her husband’s health declined, Miriam stepped to the fore.

Faced with mounting debt — and clinging to the assurances that a big payday was coming — she was determined to right their financial ship.

That’s when she became a “money mule.”

sweepstakes-scam-counterfeit-checks

In this Monday, June 11, 2012 photo, Assistant Attorney General David Kirkman holds checks of the type often received by targets in his Raleigh, N.C., office. The recipient forwarded them to his office. Kirkman said sometimes the checks carry the names and account numbers of legitimate companies, and by the time a bank confirms they’re bogus, the victim has usually sent the amount to the scammer via wire and ends up on the hook for the money. He also said the amount of money swindled from North Carolinians by these scams has doubled in the past year.

She can’t remember whether it was in a phone call or a note. But Howard told her that she’d been “hired” by the Canadian sweepstakes company.

On May 5, 2005, a package from Bloomingdale, N.J., containing $8,275 in cash arrived at the Parkers’ home. It was followed five days later by a FedEx packet with $10,000, then three days after that by an envelope stuffed with $25,000.

In just over one week, Miriam Parker would receive and repackage $60,000 in cash for delivery to Mr. Stewart of Papineau Street, Montreal.

Having the money hopscotch from one victim to another complicates things for would-be investigators.

Sometimes, there would be two stacks of bills, one much thicker than the other, tucked into magazines. The smaller pile was Miriam Parker’s “commission.”

If someone sent her a check, she was to convert it to cash and send that along, Howard said — and she wasn’t to tell her children about their dealings.

But the kids had already become alarmed by changes in their mother’s behavior.

During visits, Jim noticed that she would race him to the phone, and then prevent him from listening to the conversations.

She stopped going over to Linda’s house to help with the babysitting. And when the couple would go to the mountain house, they’d only stay the day — because Miriam was expecting a call and had to be home to get it.

And then there was the sudden need for loans. When Donna asked what for, her parents were evasive, saying they were helping one of the grandkids with school expenses. By then, they owed her $20,000 and Jim another couple thousand.

Jim sent his mother articles about people who’d been scammed.

When the kids finally persuaded their mother to get a credit report, the news was jaw-dropping. Their thrifty parents were nearly $200,000 in debt.

Miriam Parker insisted that their ship was about to come in, and that she would soon repay all the loans. So Donna gave her a deadline.

In an email to the other siblings, she explained: “I told her that if the money was not there by Wednesday, July 6, the family would be forced to do things we do not look forward to. I also implored her not to give Howard any more money. She still believes in him.”

The money, of course, did not come. It was time to get authorities involved.

Raleigh police told Donna there was nothing they could do unless the perpetrators were local, and so she went to the state Attorney General’s Elder Fraud Unit. Around that same time, Donna received a call from the FBI — her parents had popped up on their radar in connection with another case.

It became apparent to authorities that the Parkers weren’t truly willing participants in the scam. So they staged the December family intervention.

That kitchen-table gathering ended promisingly, with Miriam assuring Fleming and Evers that she would not forward any more packages. Charles told them he felt as if a heavy burden had been lifted.

Donna allowed herself to hope that the people who’d ripped off her parents would be caught — and that they might even get some of their money back.

But a frantic phone call a couple of weeks later dashed those hopes.

“They’re going to turn the gas off,” her mother told her on a day with temperatures forecast to plunge into the 20s. Calling the utility company, Donna learned that her parents owed more than $900.

Next it was the electricity. Then the water. Eventually, the children were having to buy their parents’ groceries.

Even then, Miriam remained convinced that Clark was her friend. At one point, she invited him to the family’s mountain retreat to meet her kids. The Parker siblings sardonically referred to him as “our other brother Howard.”

Attorneys Donna contacted could offer no help — the elder Parkers hadn’t been deemed incompetent, and it was their money.

And the envelopes just kept coming — from San Jose and Hayward in California, from East Liberty, Ohio.

In April 2006, Jim Parker and his wife Susan came to town for Donna’s wedding. They were sitting in his parents’ kitchen when the doorbell rang.

The FedEx driver handed Jim a crinkly envelope. From the outline, he knew without opening it what was inside. He sneaked downstairs to his old bedroom, pulled out a business card with a gold seal on it and dialed the number.

“I’ve got this package,” he said. “What do you want me to do with it?”

He and David Kirkman, manager of the Elder Fraud Prevention Project in the AG’s office, met at a gas station. When authorities opened the envelope, they found an old issue of Martha Stewart Living magazine. It contained $5,725 in cash from a Visalia, Calif., widow.

Kirkman called a contact at Federal Express, who ordered a stop on deliveries and pickups at the Parker home.

But the crooks just switched to United Parcel Service.

And now, in addition to money, they were delivering and picking up car tires and custom rims, and laptop computers worth thousands of dollars — all purchased by other elderly victims.

That’s when state and federal authorities reached out to their counterparts north of the border.

___

The FBI subpoenaed records from the courier services Miriam Parker was using and found the address in Montreal. On Aug. 2, 2006, officers of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police and Surete du Quebec paid the occupant a visit.

Dave Stewart acknowledged accepting numerous packages from the American lady on behalf of a man whom he knew as “Roger.” Stewart, a native of Jamaica, said he was paid $100 per package.

In all, Miriam Parker had shipped 119 packages totaling more than $606,000 to Stewart. Professing ignorance of any illegal activity, Stewart agreed to cooperate.

Howard, meanwhile, gave Miriam a new address to which she should forward items.

On Aug. 17, 2006, laptops valued at more than $7,200 arrived from Hayward, Calif. She sent them to a “Joseph Reid” on Sixth Avenue in the Montreal borough of Verdun.

Parcels kept coming — from Texas and Massachusetts, South Carolina and Washington, Missouri and Maine.

By December 2006, with the Parkers’ credit card debt topping $70,000, the family held another kitchen-table intervention.

This time, they persuaded their parents to grant Donna a limited power of attorney. One of the first things she did was change their phone number — though too late to stop them making $650 in calls to Jamaica in one month.

In January 2007, she accompanied her parents to the credit union, where they took out a 30-year, $179,000 mortgage on their home.

But it was like shoveling sand against the tide. Late that spring, Donna Parker got a call from a grocery store near her parents’ home. Her mother had been in five times that day to wire money.

She remembers one particular evening, sitting around the kitchen table, attempting to help her parents draft a budget. About an hour and a half into the visit, she realized they hadn’t been paying attention.

“Why aren’t you listening to this?” she asked.

“We’re waiting for the phone call,” her mother replied. They were expecting delivery that night of a new Mercedes, another supposed reward that would never come, of course.

Exasperated, Donna stormed out.

___

Miriam Parker had become a cog in Howard Clark’s fraud machine. The FBI’s Fleming decided to turn the tables on him.

On April 3, 2007, Miriam phoned him — this time with Fleming recording.

“Howard?”

“Yes, dear,” he replied sweetly.

It might have been her fault, Miriam began, that they’d had trouble with some shipments lately.

“I should have mentioned to you, I’ve been having an ear wax problem, and it’s gotten real serious …,” she said apologetically. “I don’t always hear too well.”

As the conversation went on, Howard grew testy about her failure to send her packages quickly. In one case, he noted, trucks had left a UPS office just before an important package arrived from her. Send everything next-day air, he demanded.

When she asked whether she should go back to her former shipper, Howard cut her off.

“Don’t go back to that same store, sweetheart. No, you can’t never go there again.”

When she suggested that the person at the store was just trying to save her some money, Howard told her that was not their concern.

“I’m giving you the money to pay for this. YOU just do what I instruct you to do, dear.”

Perhaps sensing he’d been too hard, he changed his tone.

“Not to say that YOU are making the mistake, but maybe they are,” he said. “And we can’t afford for you OR them to make the mistake.”

But this time it was Howard who’d made the mistake.

Using “trap and trace” technology, the FBI determined the pitch calls were coming from Montreal, and Mounties soon had a real name for “Howard Clark” — he was Clayton Atkinson.

Atkinson had 13 convictions for assault, theft and weapons possession stretching back to 1994.

On April 13, 2007, three officers in blue flak vests positioned themselves at the door of his apartment. An agent down the hall dialed Clark’s number, and the ringtone sounded from inside.

Pretending to be Jim Parker, the agent said he was calling to help his mother collect her prize. As soon as Atkinson spoke, the officers burst in.

In Raleigh, a federal grand jury handed up a 35-count indictment against Atkinson and two co-defendants — Dave Stewart and Jamaal McKenzie, aka “Joseph Reid”. The three were charged with one count each of conspiracy and interstate transportation of stolen property, seven counts of wire fraud and 26 counts of mail fraud.

___

Even then, the trouble wasn’t finished for the Parkers, obviously now a marked couple.

Not long after the indictments, Donna Parker got a call from a Western Union office near her parents’ home. They’d been there twice in one day, “sending money to a relative in Jamaica.”

By then, Charles and Miriam Parker were nearly 84. Pushed to the edge, Donna suggested it was time they let her take over their affairs.

“I am NOT mentally incompetent,” her father, who had suffered a second heart attack, protested.

parker

In this Monday, June 18, 2012 photo at her Cary, N.C., home, Donna Parker holds a picture of her father, Charles, shortly before his death in February 2012. She and her siblings spent years extricating their parents from an international sweepstakes scam. 

“Dad,” she replied. “I’m not going to go and say you’re incompetent. But I will go and say you’re financially incompetent.”

In May 2008, she filed a petition seeking appointment of a financial guardian. The last line was the most difficult of all: “It is the Petitioner’s opinion that senility or some other undiagnosed condition may be the cause of the Respondent’s actions.”

The court appointed local attorney David T. Watters guardian ad litem. The Parkers were “charming and personable,” but hopelessly blind to their predicament, he wrote.

It was clear to him that Miriam Parker was the main concern.

“Incredibly, Respondent fails to recognize that the family is the victim of a cruel financial scam,” he wrote. “In two conversations, she indicated that she felt that she was working with a better quality of person at this time, and that these people would live up to their promise to provide money to Respondent.”

The court appointed Donna Parker guardian of their estate.

Clayton Atkinson

This undated photo provided by the Edgecombe County Sheriff’s Office shows Clayton Atkinson. In 2007, the FBI determined phone calls to defraud Charles and Miriam Parker in North Carolina were coming from Montreal, and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police soon had a real name for the man who identified himself as “Howard Clark” to them. He was Clayton Atkinson.

The criminal case ground slowly along, and last year Atkinson and Stewart pleaded guilty to one count each of conspiracy and mail fraud. (Jamaal McKenzie is awaiting trial in Canada on an unrelated assault charge.) The plea agreement listed 31 individuals who’d been defrauded of a total of $840,705.

When Atkinson appeared for sentencing at U.S. District Court in Raleigh on March 15, Miriam and Donna Parker were there. Charles Parker had died just a month earlier.

Miriam Parker had imagined Howard as much older, perhaps with gray hair. Standing before them was a 33-year-old man, his dark hair cropped close.

When the time came for victim impact statements, Donna Parker rose. She told Judge Terrence W. Boyle that it had taken two years to pay off the credit card debt her parents had racked up. She talked of the cashed-in insurance policies and liquidated stocks, and of the mortgage they’d been forced to take out.

She told of having to take her parents to court, and of the lingering resentment it had caused.

“To this day,” she said, still referring to her father in the present tense, “they are convinced that their family deprived them of their right to prizes and lottery winnings.”

Her father was now beyond further harm, she told the judge. But she lived in constant fear that her mother would be victimized again.

“The sad thing is, I know my family is not unique,” she said. “Scammers who prey on the elderly are a blight on society.”

For his part, Atkinson pledged to “pursue legitimate things in the future.” He hoped to one day return to Canada to care for his aging father.

Seizing on this, the judge asked: “Can you imagine if somebody like you was doing this to your family? Could you imagine how shocked and outraged you’d be?”

Atkinson stood mute.

“Answer me!” Boyle thundered.

“I can’t sit in front of you and give an excuse for it,” Atkinson said.

Boyle sentenced Atkinson to 12½ years in prison, Stewart to 6½. He also ordered them to pay $840,705 in restitution — $84,350 of it to Miriam Parker.

No money has been recovered, Agent Fleming told the judge.

Responding to an interview request, Atkinson sent The Associated Press a three-page, expletive-laced letter, cursing prosecutors, his lawyer and America’s “corrupted justice system.”

“i am angry and miserable everyday,” he wrote in his unpunctuated, ungrammatical reply. “my life is (expletive) ruined now you think i care about the parkers”.

___

Even today, Miriam Parker seems conflicted about the man she still refers to as Howard.

“He was always very nice,” she said.

She managed to keep her home, but she’s lost most of her independence. Each month, Donna sends her a debit card with $500 on it, to pay for food, prescriptions and gas — soon to be 88, her mother still drives. The daughter still screens the mail and pays all the other bills.

On a recent, sultry day, she and Donna sat at that familiar oak table, a Lazy Susan piled with junk mail between them. On the shelf was a new memento: A miniature Mountie, keeping watch in his iconic red tunic and broad-brimmed hat.

How could Miriam have taken money from other people, knowing what she and her husband had been through?

“I didn’t realize some of that was happening,” she replied, meekly.

She looked down at the table and shuffled envelopes.

“As I look back on it, it was a good bit of stupidity on my part,” she said, her voice dropping. “I just felt that I had really been a real sucker — I really had. And, but, I guess I was just so anxious.”

She keeps turning it over in her mind: How did Howard get her name? It must have been that company she used to buy that cheap jewelry from, she figures.

“It had a Canadian address,” she said absentmindedly.

She said she knows better than to respond to such junk mail now.

“I’d better not,” she said, casting a glance at her daughter. “Or they would’ve been on my back, right?”

“Yes, ma’am,” Donna replied.

“Which is all right,” the mother said. “I have very smart kids.”

“We had to be,” her daughter said.

Source of article: Big Story

Advertisements
 
1 Comment

Posted by on 03/30/2013 in Victim Stories

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Nigerian Scammers Phone Numbers

WARNING – NIGERIAN SCAMMERS

If you receive a phone call by any of the following numbers then it is a Nigerian scam — Do not be fooled, these are just low life Africans trying to steal your hard-earned money and they will lie and cheat just to steal it!

  1. 4702382022
  2. 4705144904
  3. 4702000432 – Pretending to be Market Max
  4. 4702382011
  5. 4705142861
  6. 4702539600
  7. 4702261741 470-226-1741
  8. 4702261741
  9. 4702382024
  10. 4703150481 – A scammer I’ve posted several months ago using the name Garry Blair is currently using this number to scam. Mind you, he’ll change his (fake) name every so often. rhowhd@gmail.com
  11. 4702539603
  12. 4702539605
  13. 4702440761
  14. 4702539604
  15. 4702466699
  16. 4702531664 – Currently lurking Craigslist
  17. 4702462627
  18. 4702019701
  19. 4706733980
  20. 4706733980
  21. 4702382031
  22. 4706733980
  23. 4702382026
  24. 4702382026
  25. 4703151051
  26. 4703776916

Some of the scams may be;

(Payday) Loan Scam
Charity Scam
Investment Scam
Lottery – Telling you that you’ve won a prize but you will first need to pay a fee in advance and/or give your personal details out. Don’t fall for it.

Debt Scam – Try to harass you and threaten you will jail time unless you pay a ‘debt’ or they will use some other phony excuse. Don’t believe it! They are only Nigerian scammers who somehow managed to get your phone number and is trying to get you to send cash their way (most likely through Western Union or Money Gram)

Craigslist Scam

 
1 Comment

Posted by on 03/30/2013 in Other

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

“Sr Gutierrez Luis”

WARNING – EMAIL SCAM / PHONY LOAN OFFER

Loan Offer !!!!!
From: info@bpp.es <info@bpp.es>

FROM THE DESK OF BANCO PUPOLAR AUDITOR
SR.GUTIERREZ LUIS
BANCO POPULAR BANK
CALLE VALAZQUEZ , 34
28001 MADRID, SPAIN
Email: banco.auditores@outlook.com

Hurray! Hurray!! Hurray!!! We Are 50 (50th Anniversary).

BANCO POPULAR BANK-Spain celebrate their 50th year Anniversary on 30th of April 2013 and to crown this great occasion, we are given out loans to individuals, business men and women both our old and current customers and non customers being an European community or not.

Base on this, the date of application for a loan from €5000.00 to €1,000.000.00 is from 30th of April 2013. The interest rate is 0.3% per year and the maximum period is 6 years.

We don’t count on your previous debt to any organization or whatsoever; we want every individual to rejoice with us on our 50th year anniversary. Your loan process will be 48 hours from the day of your application.

If you are interested to take a loan from us send this below information to this email address banco.auditores@outlook.com

Full Names: ___________________________
Date of Birth: __________________________
Country: ______________________________
Amount Needed as Loan: ________________
Loan Duration: ________________________
Occupation: ___________________________
Mobile Phone: _________________________

Qualifications:
1) The Borrower must be at least 18yrs old
2) The Applicant must have something doing either company owner or a civil servant e.t.c.

In acknowledgment of your reply, we will send to you our LOAN APPLICATION FORM. Be of a good cheer we are 50.

Best Regards:
Sr Gutierrez Luis

Return-Path: <info@bpp.es>
X-YahooFilteredBulk: 200.76.183.98
Received-SPF: temperror (encountered temporary error during SPF processing of domain of bpp.es)
X-Originating-IP: [200.76.183.98]
Authentication-Results: mta1595.mail.ne1.yahoo.com from=bpp.es; domainkeys=neutral (no sig); from=bpp.es; dkim=neutral (no sig)
Received: from 127.0.0.1 (HELO smtp.textilesleon.com) (200.76.183.98) by mta1595.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with SMTP; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 12:38:22 +0000
Received: from SUCKMYDICK-HP.lan ([10.0.3.250]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.textilesleon.com with ESMTP id r2R8akvO026519-r2R8akvT026519 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 27 Mar 2013 02:37:06 -0600
Message-Id: <201303270837.r2R8akvO026519-r2R8akvT026519@smtp.textilesleon.com>
Subject: Loan Offer !!!!!
To: Recipients <info@bpp.es>
From: info@bpp.es
Reply-To: banco.auditores@outlook.com
Recipients info@bpp.es Banco Audi Tores

X-Originating-IP: 200.76.183.98
Authentication-Results: mta1290.mail.ac4.yahoo.com from=bpp.es; domainkeys=neutral (no sig); from=bpp.es; dkim=neutral (no sig)
Received: from 127.0.0.1 (HELO smtp.textilesleon.com) (200.76.183.98) by mta1290.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with SMTP; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 06:08:50 -0700
Received: from SUCKMYDICK-HP.lan ([10.0.3.250]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.textilesleon.com with ESMTP id r2R8akvO026519-r2R8akve026519 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 27 Mar 2013 02:38:11 -0600
Message-Id: <201303270838.r2R8akvO026519-r2R8akve026519@smtp.textilesleon.com>

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on 03/30/2013 in Other

 

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

“Bernard Lee” a.k.a “Dr. Jacob Anderson”

WARNING – ATM CARD SCAM / ADVANCE FEE FRAUD

credit-card-scams

Subject: YOUR COMPENSATION PAYMENT FUND VIA ATM MASTER CARD

Message contains attachments1 File (80KB)
UNITED NATIONS POPULATION FUNDS.docx
Kindly open to find the attached file and read carefully inorder for you to receive your payment.

Return-Path: infor@unfpa.org
X-YahooFilteredBulk: 103.11.75.8
Received-SPF: none (domain of unfpa.org does not designate permitted sender hosts)
X-Originating-IP: [103.11.75.8]
Authentication-Results: mta1334.mail.ne1.yahoo.com from=unfpa.org; domainkeys=neutral (no sig); from=unfpa.org; dkim=neutral (no sig)
Received: from 127.0.0.1 (EHLO mxserver4.masterweb.com) (103.11.75.8) by mta1334.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
Received: from trunks.s.masterweb.com ([174.37.68.44] helo=server8017x.masterweb.net) by mxserver4.masterweb.com with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from <infor@unfpa.org>) id 1UL65x-000210-2t; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 13:14:00 +0700
Received: from 50-77-188-35-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([50.77.188.35]:2115 helo=User) by server8017x.masterweb.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <infor@unfpa.org>) id 1UL65U-0002LY-3N;
Reply-To: <drjacobanderson58@hotmail.com>
From: “Bernard Lee”<infor@unfpa.org>
Subject: YOUR COMPENSATION PAYMENT FUND VIA ATM MASTER CARD
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1081
Message-ID: <E1UL65x-000210-2t@mxserver4.masterweb.com>
X-Originating-IP: 174.37.68.44
X-SpamExperts-Domain: server8017x.masterweb.com
X-SpamExperts-Username: 174.37.68.44
Authentication-Results: masterweb.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=174.37.68.44
X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Class: unsure
X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.53)
X-Recommended-Action: accept

Bernard Lee infor@unfpa.org Return-Path: drjacobanderson58@hotmail.com ← Dr. Jacob Anderson is another fake name used by the scammer.

RE: YOUR COMPENSATION PAYMENT FUND VIA ATM MASTER CARD
From: Dr Jacob Anderson

SEND THE REQUIRED DETAILS.

Return-Path: <drjacobanderson58@hotmail.com>
X-YahooFilteredBulk: 65.54.190.84
Received-SPF: pass (domain of hotmail.com designates 65.54.190.84 as permitted sender)
X-Originating-IP: [65.54.190.84]
Authentication-Results: mta1115.mail.ne1.yahoo.com from=hotmail.com; domainkeys=neutral (no sig); from=hotmail.com; dkim=neutral (no sig)
Received: from 127.0.0.1 (EHLO bay0-omc2-s9.bay0.hotmail.com) (65.54.190.84) by mta1115.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with SMTP; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 13:20:55 +0000
Received: from BAY170-W41 ([65.54.190.124]) by bay0-omc2-s9.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 29 Mar 2013 06:20:54 -0700
X-EIP: [rRsozxBj6wH8vhohKTGFTjV3XddqKOjL]
X-Originating-Email: drjacobanderson58@hotmail.com
Message-ID: <BAY170-W4162102D58A269E3F421A9BFD30@phx.gbl>
Return-Path: drjacobanderson58@hotmail.com
From: Dr Jacob Anderson <drjacobanderson58@hotmail.com>
Subject: RE: YOUR COMPENSATION PAYMENT FUND VIA ATM MASTER CARD
References: <E1UL65x-000210-2t@mxserver4.masterweb.com>,<1364539537.69224.YahooMailClassic@web161002.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on 03/29/2013 in Lottery Scam

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Secure Your Inbox; Protecting your (Yahoo) Mail account from phishing scams and hackers

internet_abuse_spamSign-in Seal

Sign-in seals are a safeguard from Yahoo! Mail. They help you fight online phishing scams (people trying to trick you into giving up your password or personal information by spoofing legitimate web sites).

Here’s how your sign-in seal works: You provide us with an image (such as a personal photo) or a secret message. Whenever we ask you to sign into Yahoo! Mail, we’ll display your image or message. If it’s not displayed, you may have landed on a “spoofed” site. It only takes a minute to create your sign-in seal.

Note: Your sign-in seal is saved on the computer that you create it on, not on Yahoo! Mail’s servers. So if you use more than one computer or browser, you’ll want to create a sign-in seal for each one. Also, don’t create a sign-in seal on a computer you share with strangers, such as those in libraries, Internet cafés, and other public places

Phishing Tips

Avoiding phishing scams is tough. Phishers know every trick in the book, and they’re dreaming up new ones as we speak. So here are some things to keep in mind while you’re online:

Don’t believe every warning you read—especially pop-up warnings that appear while you’re surfing the Web. Unscrupulous companies use pop-up ads to display false warnings about your computer. Ignore them.

Do NOT click any button in these pop-ups, such as a “Close” or “No” button, or the “Close” box that may appear in the upper-right corner of the pop-up. Doing this might install a virus or other malicious software on your computer. To safely close a pop-up ad, press Ctrl-W (if you’re using a Windows computer) or Command-W (on a Mac computer).

Be suspicious of “free” advice.You may receive an email that claims to be from a computer expert, warning you of a virus. These are usually hoaxes. Do not follow the steps described in any email unless you’re sure the threat is real.

There is no Yahoo! Lottery. Don’t be fooled by people pretending to be Yahoo! and offering cash prizes. We would never send you information about a contest you never entered. If you’ve received a message like “Final Notification: Yahoo! Mail Winner!” or “Your Email Address Has Won $XX million,” it’s a scam. Don’t reply to the email, don’t click any links in it, and never divulge any personal information. Instead, click the “Spam” button.

Authentication

Phishing is the act of creating legitimate looking messages, masquerading as a trusted entity to lure you into clicking on emails that are designed to steal vital personal information like your password and financial data. To prevent such email forgery and spoofing we use DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) which allows senders to digitally sign their emails so that Yahoo! Mail can then verify the authenticity of the sender. In addition, Yahoo! Mailsupports Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting and Conformance (DMARC), a specification spearheaded by major technology providers and email senders to collectively fight spam and phishing scams.

Source: http://antispam.yahoo.com/

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on 03/29/2013 in Uncategorized

 

Tags: , , ,

“ISSAVWC 2013”

WARNING – NIGERIAN SCAM

scamtrap

Dear Colleague,

You are welcome to participate in the coming international summit against sexual assault, violence on women and children (ISSAVWC). The international summit will commence from 21st to 24th May at the San Diego Convention Center 111 W Harbor Dr San Diego, CA 92101 United States and 27th to 30th May 2013 at the Gaston Berger University Conference Hall in St Louis Senegal. The summit is been organized and sponsored by the International women children welfare organization and other benevolent organizations worldwide.

Sexual violence exists in every community. This summit is committed to increasing awareness about sexual violence and educating its members about the signs, effects and consequences of sexual abuse, assault and harassment. Whether through child sexual abuse awareness and prevention programs, presentations to community groups or training for service providers in community agencies, the Sexual Assault Program continues to strengthen society’s response to sexual violence by educating and training one person at a time.
All victims/survivors, both male and female, can access free, confidential sexual assault services whether the assault took place recently, years ago, or during childhood.

Our position on sexual assault:
• Sexual assault is a violation of human rights and is a crime against the individual and the community. It is not solely an individual or private problem.
• Sexual assault is both a consequence and reinforcer of the power disparity between men and women. It is a violent act of power which in the main, is carried out by men against women and children.
• Sexual assault has far reaching emotional, social, legal, health and political consequences.
• The prevention and elimination of sexual assault is the responsibility of the whole community.

The summit theme is “Protecting Woman Children in a Changing World” and the sub-themes are:
• Prevention of Abuse and Sexual Assault through early and sustained involvement
• Interventions and programmes for woman and children and families experiencing adversity
• Addressing children’s rights and participation
• Reforms in child protection and welfare policy
• Children in out of home care
• Building the evidence base
• Contemporary issues

Topics
An overview and epidemiology of child sexual abuse
The trauma impact on children of all ages from preschoolers to adolescents
Better understanding of the impact on the brain and physiological systems that have long-term effects
Knowledge about effective preventions and interventions for children and youth; case studies presented
Internet usage as a gateway to childhood sexual abuse
Legal and reporting issues involved in a child sex abuse investigation

In order to attend the international summit against sexual assault, violence on women and children (ISSAVWC), registration is compulsory. Interested participants should download the attached registration forms A and B which must be carefully filled out and submitted along with the details below to the Registration Desk via E-Mail: issavwc_registration@aol.com . Note that registration closes March 28th 2013 to enable participant’s process their Visa. Interested delegates wishing to attend the forth coming international conference are to submit their registration forms before March 25th 2013.

•Names exactly as in passport
•Passport Number
•Date of Birth
•Place of Birth
•Country of Residence
•Occupation
•Marital Status
•Phone Contact
•Postal Address
•Who invited you?

VISA INFORMATION: Participants must be in possession of their International Passports to enable them participate. Only on receipt of your filled registration forms, reservation receipt and scanned information page of your international passport will participant’s visa assistance request be forwarded to the U.S Department of State and the Senegalese Immigration for same day visa Authorization which shall be sent to the consular section of the U.S Embassy, in your country of residence.

ACCOMMODATION: All registered participants are entitled to meals and accommodation which will be provided during their participation in the U.S.A only due to the inability of our donor sponsoring committee to mobilize enough funds to sponsor the number of expected delegates to attend the conference. Delegates are only responsible for the payment of their Hotel Accommodation in Dakar Senegal for the second phase of the event at the recommended hotel.

Most Canadian citizens and many citizens from Visa Waiver Program countries can come to the U.S. without a visa if they meet certain requirements. Visa waiver travelers from ALL 27 Visa Waiver Program countries must present a machine-readable passport at the U.S. port of entry to enter the U.S. without a visa, otherwise a U.S. visa is required. See important information about the 10/26/05 digital photograph and 10/26/06 e-passport requirements for VWP travelers. Other foreign citizens will need a non-immigrant visa.

Non-immigrant visas are for international travelers (citizens of other countries) coming to the U.S. temporarily. This visa allows you to travel to a U.S. port-of-entry (airport, for example) and request permission of the Department of Homeland Security immigration inspector to enter the U.S. Please note: a visa does not guarantee entry into the U.S. International travelers come to the U.S. for a wide variety of reasons, including tourism, business, medical treatment, and certain types of temporary work. The type of visa needed is defined by immigration law, and relates to the principal purpose of your travel. For an overview of the types of non-immigrant visas available under immigration law. Most attendees will be using the B-1 Visa for temporary visitor for business.

Due to security concerns, U.S. visa applications are subject to a greater degree of scrutiny than in the past. For many applicants, a personal interview is required as a standard part of visa processing. All participants visa assistance request will be forwarded to the U.S Department of State for visa authorization which shall be sent by fax to the consular section of the U.S. Embassy, in your country of residence. This can only be done when we receive your filled registration questioner forms and all necessary documents to support your visa processing which will be faxed to the U.S. Embassy, in your country of residence by our organization.

AIR TICKETS: Air Tickets for both venues will be sponsored by our organization and other benevolent donors in the United States and worldwide. The tickets will cover from participant country of resident to the United States, from the United Stated to Senegal and back to participant’s country of resident.

Due to time factors of the forth-coming international event, I request that you quickly fill the requested forms ASAP to enable us process your registration.

Sincerely

Tiffany Martin
Secretary – Organizing committee
International summit against sexual assault, violence on women and children (ISSAVWC)
1953 Holmby Avenue. Los Angeles, California
Tel: 206-339-4320
Sent from my BlackBerry wireless device from MTN

issavwc_registration@aol.com

—–     —–     —–     —–     —–

Dear Sir/Madam.

You are cordially invited to join us at the international summit against
sexual assault, violence on women and children (ISSAVWC 2013). The
international summit will commence from 21st to 24th and 27th to 30th May
2013 here in United States of America and Senegal.

Our mission is to support and help Strengthening the Fight against sexual
assault, violence on women and children. In this conference, we want to gather
the world and offer a rich program with lectures, symposia, poster sessions
and social events.

If you are interested in attending this summit, please contact the ISSAVWC
Secretariat for more information via E-mail: committee.r@californiamail.com
and register as soon as possible. You can also contact me via my E-mail

We look forward to welcoming you all to ISSAVWC 2013

Sincerely,
Carolyn Taylor
carolyntaylor@mynet.com
International summit against sexual assault, violence on women and children
(ISSAVWC)

Return-Path: <carolyntaylor@mynet.com>
X-Originating-IP: [196.28.232.113]
Authentication-Results: mta1293.mail.bf1.yahoo.com from=mynet.com; domainkeys=neutral (no sig); from=mynet.com; dkim=neutral (no sig)
Received: from 127.0.0.1 (EHLO mail.carenpl.org.mz) (196.28.232.113)
by mta1293.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 15:53:54 -0700
Received: from mail.carenpl.org.mz (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.carenpl.org.mz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36A522B34B2;
Received: from carenpl.org.mz (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.carenpl.org.mz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 373DA2B31EB;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 09:02:07 +0200 (CAT)
From: “carolyntaylor@mynet.com” <carolyntaylor@mynet.com>
Subject: Invitation -=?UTF-8?Q?_Conf=C3=A9rence_inter?=national
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 09:02:06 +0200
Message-Id: <20130218065543.M4855@mynet.com>
X-Mailer: OpenWebMail 2.53 
X-OriginatingIP: 41.82.72.18
Originating IP: 41.82.72.18 Originating ISP: Sonatel City: Dakar Country of Origin: Senegal

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on 03/28/2013 in Other

 

Tags: , , , , , , ,

“Luz Reyes” “Donella Weingartner”

WARNING – RENTAL SCAM / ONLINE SCAMMER

rental-scam

Subject Line: Fwd: $625 / 2br – 1075ft&sup2; – Outstanding 2 bedroom 1 bathroom Rental (Loris)

From: luz.reyes24304@yahoo.com <luz.reyes24304@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 1:03 PM
Subject: $625 / 2br – 1075ft&sup2; – Outstanding 2 bedroom 1 bathroom
Rental (Loris)
To: <emailuser@gmail.com>

Hey Daisy,
Did you get my last email?
The property is a bedroom bath with garage and washer/dryer. Pets are
allowed with a $100 cleaning charge.
The requirements to lease our property are as follows:
1. Photo ID
2. First months rent and optional fee for pets
3. Lease Agreement, I’ll bring it to the viewing
(It is month to month, 6 month or a 1 year lease)
4. Background check for each applicant
The service we use is Tenant Verified, here is a link.
This is an affordable way for me to screen applicants based on prior
tenant history and employment information. If you have a felony or bad
tenant history, I am flexible and I’ll work with you.
Let me know when you have your background check. It’s in a .pdf, you
can print it and bring to the viewing or email it to me. I am looking
for real tenants not window shoppers or tire kickers, right now I have
3 rental properties and a full time job.
What is the best contact number for you? Are you available tomorrow?
Enjoy your Tuesday!
Luz Reyes

_________________

From: donellaweingartner@yahoo.com <donellaweingartner@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 11:08 AM
Subject: $625 / 2br – 1075ft&sup2; – Outstanding 2 bedroom 1 bathroom
Rental (Loris)
To: “emailuser@gmail.com”

Hey Daisy,
The property is a bedroom bath with garage and full size washer and
dryer. Dogs and cats are allowed with a $100 cleaning fee.
Requirements to rent our property are as follows:
1. PhotoID
2. 1st months rent and optional fee for pets
3. Rental Agreement, I’ll bring it to the viewing
(Options are month-to-month, 6 month or a 1 year lease)
4. Background check for each applicant
The provider we use is Tenant Verified: link.
This is an affordable way for me to screen applicants based on
previous rental history and employment information. If you have a
criminal record or bad tenant history, I am flexible and I’ll work
with you.
Let me know when you’ve completed your background check. It’s in a
.pdf, you can print it and bring to the viewing or email it to me. I
am looking for real tenants not window shoppers or tire kickers, right
now I have 3 rental properties and a full time job.
What is the best contact number for you? Are you available tomorrow?
Enjoy your Monday!
Donella Weingartner

 

Donella Weingartner also uses the name Donella Pomponi and Barrister Bernard OBI

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on 03/28/2013 in Craigslist Scam

 

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

 
%d bloggers like this: